Memory settings look good and the error message looks misleading. Use the same memory settings in following runs.
Can you run without the virtual mass to ensure modeling is alright? Also just to ensure this is not version specific try running in lower version like 2014.1 , or 2017.1...
If nothing works then you might have to send us the file to try further debugging.
OK, i will try to run it by removing the MFLUID, then run, but do you noticed that the dry mode frequency seems found by the simulation, so only the second step of calculating the wet mode is stopped....
Meanwhile, I will try to install a old version in my sever, thanks!
Today I tried to use Nastran 2017.1, 2016&2020, but the same error is still here.... May be the elements included in the MFLUID is too many, I do not know whether there is a limit number for it.
MFLUID is very memory intensive. You can try using METHOD(COUPLED)=XX in case control. This will give you comparable answer, not exactly same as MFLUID. This is there from Nastran 2020 QRG.
4. METHOD(COUPLED) is only used when STRUCTURE and FLUID COUPLED problem. The
corresponding EIGRL or EIGR requires either the frequency range of interest or ND (number of
roots desired) entry. The real coupled modes computation is done with combination of Lanczos
method and Subspace iteration method.
METHOD(COUPLED) is recommended for heavy fluid (like liquids) model. When it is applied to
the light fluid model, it might require more coupled modes to get the correct result.
Just require to model the complete structure and the fluid cavity and use the METHOD(COUPLED)=XX..
OK, thank you for all your help. So the Virtual Fluid Mass Method is not feasible in Nastran if the wet element is too many, am I right? if I am right, which is the feasible wet element number to run the simulation?
Thanks again.
Meanwhile, I will try to set up another model by using your above suggestion.