hexagon logo

Pas cmm

Hi all I was wondering if anybody out there has had any dealings with PAS Cmm

we have had somebody come into the firm to demonstrate it (I was not there at the time but somebody else took my place)\

it seems ok but I am a little concerned about the amount of support for it

in the UK it seems to be fairly expensive for the amount of benefits it gives compared to PC-Dmis

we also use a lot of custom scripts which it also doesn't support and would have to be edited in using PC-Dmis

they are trying to sell it to us for a month and they say that they can train people in four weeks to use it !

sorry if I sound a little sceptical (a dinosaur with over 20 years experience).

I am currently using 2016 MR4 and have asked hexagon to send in an apps engineer to asses my programming to see if I can do things quicker

personally I do not believe it

I would prefer for that amount of money to be spent on a renishaw sp25 scanning probe as this would speed up my programming by not taking single points to do constructions and scanning the surfaces instead I also hope we might see some speed increases on the cmm as some features are large bores approx. 1100mm diameter 72pt construction with 3mm prehit/retract compared to scanning has anybody seen this or is it just wish full thinking
Parents
  • My aim is to use the sp25 to do scans that we currently do with TTP also large diameters (600mm or larger) as I see this as the biggest gains there will be a lot of features that we will still measure using tp20 a lot of it will be suck it and see as we go if we see a benefit then we will use it the machines are being used almost 24/7 so a few minuets savings on a 30-40mins program run is a win.
    The problem with the so called backlog with Cmm programming was not an issue as we have an offline station the problem came to light when one of our cmm guys with over 18 years experience left leaving me to cover production not programming but they have to blame somebody and be shown to be doing something
Reply
  • My aim is to use the sp25 to do scans that we currently do with TTP also large diameters (600mm or larger) as I see this as the biggest gains there will be a lot of features that we will still measure using tp20 a lot of it will be suck it and see as we go if we see a benefit then we will use it the machines are being used almost 24/7 so a few minuets savings on a 30-40mins program run is a win.
    The problem with the so called backlog with Cmm programming was not an issue as we have an offline station the problem came to light when one of our cmm guys with over 18 years experience left leaving me to cover production not programming but they have to blame somebody and be shown to be doing something
Children
No Data