hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • Replies 102 replies
  • Subscribers 22 subscribers
  • Views 2138 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Quick question About ISO.....

KIRBSTER269
If a Blueprint calls for ASME Y14.5 wouldn't this be the standard rules apply. How would I know if and when to apply ISO? I have yet to see anything on a blueprint stating this. The reason I bring this up is for the good old Profile callout. Before I make an argument, I want to cover all my resources. Customer already claims in an email that PC-DMIS is not capable of doing this. I and everyone on here already that's horse_S_H_I_T. But its Friday and I'm ready to P_I_S_S someone off
Parents
  • {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-attachmentid":400499} , an update for you guys to help us all understand ASME a little better. This is ASME Y14.5.1M-1994 Mathematical Definition of Dimensioning and Tolerancing Principles. {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-attachmentid":400500}

    Thanks . That's in a separate publication from the standard itself isn't it?
    If I understand that correctly, that is a description of how it is to be toleranced right?
    So that if it is bi-lateral, the tolerance is the sum of the positive and negative sides of the tolerance.
    If it were unilateral, the tolerance would be just the one side.
    So that's still not saying how it should be reported right? The controversy is still open to rage on... Confounded
  • in reply to Kevo_cmm
    Like Numbers, I appreciate your sharing the Y14.5.1 standard, but like Numbers, I also have to say "I do not think that means what you think it means".

    The tolerance is +t and -t. That's pretty much indisputable. But that doesn't say "report deviation this way".

    A for effort. Slight smile
Reply Children
No Data
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement