Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
What about the PC?
Googling would have been a perfectly fine solution but it also yields many answers.
i would argue that coming here was the best possible course of action as this is a community dedicated to "DMIS" so the most reliable answer would be gotten right here....where the OP found it...
so, in conclusion, the OP helped themselves by going to the one place they knew they could find the exact answer they were looking for.
Too bad Pcdmis isn't DMIS.......
Too bad Pcdmis isn't DMIS.......
It is certain that DMIS' biggest obstacle came from a U.S. patent issued in 1993 to a now-defunct CMM manufacturer for "using a communication protocol as a programming language." At that time, DMIS was being used only as a communication protocol, and the patent stopped the development of DMIS as a programming language overnight. However, the dual usage became public domain in 1995, and DMIS has been gathering momentum ever since.
Maybe partly because of this - from https://www.qualitydigest.com/oct99/html/dmis.html
The problems inherent in any translation are best demonstrated by CMM software that has DMIS Export-Out and DMIS Import-In capabilities. As the CMM reads in its own exported DMIS, the result can be surprisingly bad. This poor performance has given DMIS a bad name. Also unfortunate is the common use of brand-specific DMIS, which is created when a CMM software supplier modifies DMIS to fit into an existing product. "Flavored" DMIS is not DMIS, and it shouldn't be used.
Although the next-generation CMM software currently in development will most likely embrace the full DMIS standard, some manufacturers continue to claim that DMIS doesn't provide adequate power for the more sophisticated metrology applications. Such claims are usually made by misinformed sales representatives trying to sell obsolete software rather than satisfy their customers' needs.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |