Do you have a preference where in your program you create you measured results. I find if I wait till the end of the program it takes longer because I have to go back and identify my features.
So once I've named my datums I'll create the results while the ID's are still fresh in my head.
For me it's more efficient to measure features and then dimension. I measure all the features I can with a particular probe rotation. Rotate the probe to a new orientation and then repeat. With dimensions at the end, I can more easily order my results in a semi-logical fashion. If I have to edit the program I don't have to be concerned about messing up the balloon numbering. I can click on the feature name in the report and jump to where it's measured easily enough and so I don't lose any time searching for the feature. But that the way my brain makes sense out of all this...
For me it's more efficient to measure features and then dimension. I measure all the features I can with a particular probe rotation. Rotate the probe to a new orientation and then repeat. With dimensions at the end, I can more easily order my results in a semi-logical fashion. If I have to edit the program I don't have to be concerned about messing up the balloon numbering. I can click on the feature name in the report and jump to where it's measured easily enough and so I don't lose any time searching for the feature. But that the way my brain makes sense out of all this...