hexagon logo

What Was Your Mentally Exhausting Program??

The reason I ask is because of the program I am working on right now. I have 3 fixtures with 4 parts that I have been working on. All of them have complicated Datums / Poor design. The fixture that holds two parts is the most complex of course. The gage is the only one built to hold the part vertically. It has a hole in the back of the gage to probe the bottom of the part through. So the part sits with the rear surface in the CMM's +x direction. The part sits on the net pads for datum A about 120mm from the back surface of the gage (where the hole is) There are 18 small clips spaced around the outside edge of the part that I need to touch in the -x direction. This means I need to articulate my probe to, at times, an angle of A-115B35. This shortens the distance from the end of the probe to the Z axis column. Most of the time I am less than 2mm from crashing into the gage.

The part also only has one tiny slot to control rotation on one side of the part. So when placing the part on the gage it can rock, roll and slide everywhere. So that means I need to create local alignments on each clip to ensure that they hit correctly which means dancing around that almost crashing point the entire time. And I need to create alignment after alignment to ensure that I am hitting it correctly and then be sure that I recall a fixture alignment before proceeding because if I forget to revert back to the fixture and the next part changes in size/ location/ rotation by a mm or 2 I am guaranteed to crash. And this doesn't include the complexity of some of the dimensions and the callouts. For example a profile without datums with a unequal tolerance called out..... or a position on a single plane.....

So with all that being said I have been programming these parts for a couple weeks now and my head at the end of the day is just mush. That's where the Forum comes in. So I want to thank all of you for giving me a source of relief from my mental torture chamber over here.

Also, What are you more exhausting program memories. What is that one job that really kicked your butt?


Parents


  • I have experience with similar sounding situation....

    I used to work for a company that made funky shaped medical implants. Parts were made in a mill-turn & supplied to the CMM still on the dovetail/not "cut off" yet. We'd put the dovetail in a vice & measure the exposed part using an iterative alignment (op10). Made it really easy to hole and work with. Op20 was usually the cutoff and we'd inspect the profile of the "cutoff" area with an inspection mylar on an optical comparator. Hopefully this helps in some way.

    Here is a pic of some of the parts I am referring to..except for the screws and PEAK bone spacers all of these parts are at a weird huge broad sweeping radius and are controlled by iterative alignments:

    {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-attachmentid":498347}

    ​​​​​​


    Those kind of parts are the parts I currently work on! I actually thought you may have taken the pic from my works website.
Reply


  • I have experience with similar sounding situation....

    I used to work for a company that made funky shaped medical implants. Parts were made in a mill-turn & supplied to the CMM still on the dovetail/not "cut off" yet. We'd put the dovetail in a vice & measure the exposed part using an iterative alignment (op10). Made it really easy to hole and work with. Op20 was usually the cutoff and we'd inspect the profile of the "cutoff" area with an inspection mylar on an optical comparator. Hopefully this helps in some way.

    Here is a pic of some of the parts I am referring to..except for the screws and PEAK bone spacers all of these parts are at a weird huge broad sweeping radius and are controlled by iterative alignments:

    {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-attachmentid":498347}

    ​​​​​​


    Those kind of parts are the parts I currently work on! I actually thought you may have taken the pic from my works website.
Children