hexagon logo

Calibration. Different results

I greet you all, colleagues.
I have a small problem that tends to come and go when calibrating angles. I work with many styli and use a 9-slot magazine for this. Each stylus has about 10 different angle positions. When I did the calibration, two angles on different probes were out of tolerance. One probe has a CM25-2 probe and the other CM25-3. And at the same time, PSDMIS accepts the calibration result without asking the operator. The next day I did a similar calibration and the result was OK.And always out-of-tolerance angles equal to A90 or more than A90 It is very strange . I have been working in this mode for 3 years and there were no such problems. And this year it started. I check the probes visually and do the cleaning before each calibration the same way always. What could be the problem ?

Attached Files
Parents


  • Your 3rd link is not the best example. Except for the bombing of Berlin, Tokyo, and the 2 atomic bombs, there was little to no bombing of civilians. Berlin was retaliation for the Siege of London and Tokyo was retaliation for Pearl Harbor. The 2nd atomic bomb, we literally told the Japanese that we would use it unless they surrendered. Pacific bombing raids were done exclusively on military positions. In Europe, the U.S. and British coordinated with the French resistance to identify military and military industrial targets. No civilian targets were ever selected. Though I am sure there were some that hit civilian targets by accident. they didn't have the best technology back then. In both cases, we were attacked 1st, Pearl Harbor and Germany declaring war on us and attacking merchant ships.

    I am not pointing fingers but, we can also bring up Napoleon, Louis XVI, and Trafalgar. Quite barbaric and nasty moments in French history.



    I just took a few minutes to write it, on Sunday...
    I thought that "67,000 civilians killed from US-UK bombing" was a nice example of bad side effectsWink.

    The goal is not to compare countries, mine is not better than the others from the point of view of History.
    I just wanted to remind:
    - the parable of the straw and the beam (which we can unfortunately apply to our local politicians!)
    - that Sergiy had asked to leave aside non-metrology answers (what I'm not doing right now)
    - that aggressiveness should have no place here, even in the OFF TOPICS section

    Have a nice day
    Jef
Reply


  • Your 3rd link is not the best example. Except for the bombing of Berlin, Tokyo, and the 2 atomic bombs, there was little to no bombing of civilians. Berlin was retaliation for the Siege of London and Tokyo was retaliation for Pearl Harbor. The 2nd atomic bomb, we literally told the Japanese that we would use it unless they surrendered. Pacific bombing raids were done exclusively on military positions. In Europe, the U.S. and British coordinated with the French resistance to identify military and military industrial targets. No civilian targets were ever selected. Though I am sure there were some that hit civilian targets by accident. they didn't have the best technology back then. In both cases, we were attacked 1st, Pearl Harbor and Germany declaring war on us and attacking merchant ships.

    I am not pointing fingers but, we can also bring up Napoleon, Louis XVI, and Trafalgar. Quite barbaric and nasty moments in French history.



    I just took a few minutes to write it, on Sunday...
    I thought that "67,000 civilians killed from US-UK bombing" was a nice example of bad side effectsWink.

    The goal is not to compare countries, mine is not better than the others from the point of view of History.
    I just wanted to remind:
    - the parable of the straw and the beam (which we can unfortunately apply to our local politicians!)
    - that Sergiy had asked to leave aside non-metrology answers (what I'm not doing right now)
    - that aggressiveness should have no place here, even in the OFF TOPICS section

    Have a nice day
    Jef
Children
No Data