hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • Replies 69 replies
  • Subscribers 17 subscribers
  • Views 1692 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Calibration. Different results

FXSergiy
I greet you all, colleagues.
I have a small problem that tends to come and go when calibrating angles. I work with many styli and use a 9-slot magazine for this. Each stylus has about 10 different angle positions. When I did the calibration, two angles on different probes were out of tolerance. One probe has a CM25-2 probe and the other CM25-3. And at the same time, PSDMIS accepts the calibration result without asking the operator. The next day I did a similar calibration and the result was OK.And always out-of-tolerance angles equal to A90 or more than A90 It is very strange . I have been working in this mode for 3 years and there were no such problems. And this year it started. I check the probes visually and do the cleaning before each calibration the same way always. What could be the problem ?
Attached Files
  • in reply to Cris_C
    Thank you. I will check and complete all items.
  • in reply to Cris_C
    I compared 4 calibration reports from this year in different months. My reference sensor has stable deviations from EFT (X -0.005 Y - 0.078 Z-0.264) Stability indicates no problems, but is the deviation on the Y axis and especially on the Z axis too large? I don't understand what this deviation means? I assume that on the main probe, the XYZ THEO and XYZ MEAS coordinates should match and be the same? What do these deviations say?
  • I compared 4 calibration reports from this year in different months. My reference sensor has stable deviations from EFT (X -0.005 Y - 0.078 Z-0.264) Stability indicates no problems, but is the deviation on the Y axis and especially on the Z axis too large? I don't understand what this deviation means? I assume that on the main probe, the XYZ THEO and XYZ MEAS coordinates should match and be the same? What do these deviations say? {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-tempid":"temp_23122_1659593814994_576"}
  • I compared 4 calibration reports from this year in different months. My reference sensor has stable deviations from EFT (X -0.005 Y - 0.078 Z-0.264) Stability indicates no problems, but is the deviation on the Y axis and especially on the Z axis too large? I don't understand what this deviation means? I assume that on the main probe, the XYZ THEO and XYZ MEAS coordinates should match and be the same? What do these deviations say? {"data-align":"none","data-size":"large","data-tempid":"temp_23122_1659593814994_576"}

    When you calibrate with the "master probe", you should select "reset to theo", and select "yes, the sphere moved", so that the deviations on the master probe are zero...
    Then, you will have to re-calibrate all the probes Disappointed...
  • in reply to JEFMAN
    Thanks Jeff!
    I will calibrate all probes on Monday. I have a special calibration schedule, every two weeks on Monday. I will do as You advise me. I will let You know the result.
  • So, dear colleagues. I thank everyone for your opinions and the time you spend talking about no my topic. But please , respectfully , keep your political opinions to yourself . Just don't trash my forum with off-topic dialogues. Nobody asked you about politics here. If you don't want to help, just don't write anything and that's it.
    Thanks a lot .

    To be fair.... you did post in the off topic section of the forum. And honestly I agree with Dan. Its not entirely personal to you Sergiy. But I couldn't fathom staying in a place ran by someone so evil..... and on top of that... feeling comfortable enough with that to share it with the world. I personally would be ashamed of not only stating that I lived there but also even more disgusted with myself for not packing up and going to a country that isn't murdering civilians and causing the entire world to fear for their lives.


  • To be fair.... you did post in the off topic section of the forum. And honestly I agree with Dan. Its not entirely personal to you Sergiy. But I couldn't fathom staying in a place ran by someone so evil..... and on top of that... feeling comfortable enough with that to share it with the world. I personally would be ashamed of not only stating that I lived there but also even more disgusted with myself for not packing up and going to a country that isn't murdering civilians and causing the entire world to fear for their lives.

    "To be fair"...?
    How to say...?
    Take a look to links below, and re-read your post...

    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/06/speaker-pelosis-taiwan-visit-made-things-worse-ex-singapore-diplomat.html
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_military_operations
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World_War_II


  • "To be fair"...?
    How to say...?
    Take a look to links below, and re-read your post...

    https://www.cnbc.com/2022/08/06/speaker-pelosis-taiwan-visit-made-things-worse-ex-singapore-diplomat.html
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Timeline_of_United_States_military_operations
    https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Strategic_bombing_during_World_War_II


    Your 3rd link is not the best example. Except for the bombing of Berlin, Tokyo, and the 2 atomic bombs, there was little to no bombing of civilians. Berlin was retaliation for the Siege of London and Tokyo was retaliation for Pearl Harbor. The 2nd atomic bomb, we literally told the Japanese that we would use it unless they surrendered. Pacific bombing raids were done exclusively on military positions. In Europe, the U.S. and British coordinated with the French resistance to identify military and military industrial targets. No civilian targets were ever selected. Though I am sure there were some that hit civilian targets by accident. they didn't have the best technology back then. In both cases, we were attacked 1st, Pearl Harbor and Germany declaring war on us and attacking merchant ships.

    I am not pointing fingers but, we can also bring up Napoleon, Louis XVI, and Trafalgar. Quite barbaric and nasty moments in French history.


  • Your 3rd link is not the best example. Except for the bombing of Berlin, Tokyo, and the 2 atomic bombs, there was little to no bombing of civilians. Berlin was retaliation for the Siege of London and Tokyo was retaliation for Pearl Harbor. The 2nd atomic bomb, we literally told the Japanese that we would use it unless they surrendered. Pacific bombing raids were done exclusively on military positions. In Europe, the U.S. and British coordinated with the French resistance to identify military and military industrial targets. No civilian targets were ever selected. Though I am sure there were some that hit civilian targets by accident. they didn't have the best technology back then. In both cases, we were attacked 1st, Pearl Harbor and Germany declaring war on us and attacking merchant ships.

    I am not pointing fingers but, we can also bring up Napoleon, Louis XVI, and Trafalgar. Quite barbaric and nasty moments in French history.


    I just took a few minutes to write it, on Sunday...
    I thought that "67,000 civilians killed from US-UK bombing" was a nice example of bad side effectsWink.

    The goal is not to compare countries, mine is not better than the others from the point of view of History.
    I just wanted to remind:
    - the parable of the straw and the beam (which we can unfortunately apply to our local politicians!)
    - that Sergiy had asked to leave aside non-metrology answers (what I'm not doing right now)
    - that aggressiveness should have no place here, even in the OFF TOPICS section

    Have a nice day
    Jef



  • I just took a few minutes to write it, on Sunday...
    I thought that "67,000 civilians killed from US-UK bombing" was a nice example of bad side effectsWink.

    The goal is not to compare countries, mine is not better than the others from the point of view of History.
    I just wanted to remind:
    - the parable of the straw and the beam (which we can unfortunately apply to our local politicians!)
    - that Sergiy had asked to leave aside non-metrology answers (what I'm not doing right now)
    - that aggressiveness should have no place here, even in the OFF TOPICS section

    Have a nice day
    Jef

    Context is important Jeffery!

    Japan:
    The US was dragged into WW2 after we were attacked by Japan. We dropped atomic bombs to stop the Japanese from invading the US mainland. It was the right call. Saved approx 2million lives.

    European bombing:
    We had no choice other than to bomb the naz!s to h3ll. What do you do to a cockroach infestation? You k!ll every last one of them. If you leave one living it will continue to spread.

    Please note:
    Before we did all of the above, we went to Europe and saved for the second time in world history a country named France. Were it not for us & our weapons you'd be speaking German & pealing potatoes right now instead of being a CMM programmer. Yes you bailed us out of our Revolutionary War...but we've paid you back for that.

    Russia:
    Putin attacked Ukraine because he is a fkn weirdo with no shirt that is self deluded enough to believe he has a right to do what he's doing. He must be stopped. He has erased 15 years worth of GDP from Russia's bottom line & is killing thousands of people while lying to his people. I am not in the military. I support the military by making their products as well as not helping their enemies and right now that is unfortunately our colleague Sergiy.

    Jeff personally:
    I know your help is coming from a place of care, Jeff. Please don't take anything I said in an offensive manner. All things said, "it is what it is".

    Not matter what type of day it is..its always a "nice day" over here because we're Americans and this country is the best country that has ever existed Slight smile
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement