Radius Not Enough % of a Circle

Have you explored any of this stuff? 
https://nexus.hexagon.com/community/public/pc-dmis/f/off-topic-shop-talk/129440/small-arc-segment-deviation-graphic/736723

Also what tolerance are you trying to hold? Do you have other tools that can measure it, maybe key in the dimension? 

And of course our links we share come full circle(unlike this guy's radius)

Haha! 
I miss having access to a good vision system for all those "too small radius" parts!
Hot wax sticks and lots of practice always won in the end and we had good parts. 

Haha, same as the last thread. True, maybe in this example I just use a radius gage They are trying to hold ±.005 tolerance on a 50° radius though.

I'll definitely have to look into this "fixed radius" thing! Sometimes they put locational dimensions on these 50° radii. It sounds like the "fixed radius" might help for that?

One time there was a ±.001 tolerance on both the size and location...

Haha, same as the last thread. True, maybe in this example I just use a radius gage They are trying to hold ±.005 tolerance on a 50° radius though.

I'll definitely have to look into this "fixed radius" thing! Sometimes they put locational dimensions on these 50° radii. It sounds like the "fixed radius" might help for that?

One time there was a ±.001 tolerance on both the size and location...

Yes I think Fixed Radius would help with the locational dimension. Since in the help file it states: "Only the circle's position is allowed to vary."

I noticed that too! That PDF is lengthy though. I wonder what happens if I simply change my autocircle to fixed radius.

I'll test it out on my program that has radius sizes and locations. I guess it can't hurt...the dimensions are already "inaccurate" according to my report comment. I'll just change it to a fixed radius and do a few test runs and maybe measure the part using a comparator and a radius overlay chart.