Having a small hurdle to overcome here, would greatly appreciate a little advice if you got the time.
Profile of a Surface execution scenerio...(dmis cad, not ++)
Primary -A- = Zplus plane (leveled and z origin)
Secondary -B- = Line on Yminus face, edge of zplus (rotated xplus about zplus and y origin)
Tertiary -C- = circle in hole on Yminus face (x origin)
(As Drawing indicates)
Aligned with CAD, Online
Series of points (contour in an area within zplus), as a Feature Set. FCF set up and defined datums accordingly.
When clicking create, Message window appears which states... "primary point does not lie on secondary axis, tertiary not allowed".
Obviously, I need to correct something here, but am unsure of what, and again would greatly appreciate any advice given.
Thank You.
Thank You very much for the inquiry.
In a nutshell,
I started from scratch again. However, instead of a line at -B-, I used a plane. Instead of a circle at -C-, I used a cylinder. Constructed Pierce point and used that for X and Y origin.
It then reported appropriately.(perhaps something else was corrected during the re-write)
Then, during another program, I got the same message. This time there were two diameters. Each -B- and -C- respectively. Plane as -A-.
We went ahead and reported the profiles without using -C-as part of the FCF. One of our customers programmers told us to go ahead that way, because dmis didn't like having two different datums on the same axis or plane. Any similar conclusions?
Thank You very much for the inquiry.
In a nutshell,
I started from scratch again. However, instead of a line at -B-, I used a plane. Instead of a circle at -C-, I used a cylinder. Constructed Pierce point and used that for X and Y origin.
It then reported appropriately.(perhaps something else was corrected during the re-write)
Then, during another program, I got the same message. This time there were two diameters. Each -B- and -C- respectively. Plane as -A-.
We went ahead and reported the profiles without using -C-as part of the FCF. One of our customers programmers told us to go ahead that way, because dmis didn't like having two different datums on the same axis or plane. Any similar conclusions?