hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • Replies 4 replies
  • Subscribers 221 subscribers
  • Views 52 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

2022.1 bug

Mike Rivard


This is the problem I'm having when adding the mod on the secondary datum the position goes out an extreme amount --- Top result is 2020r2 next is 2022.1 s/p 2 with the mod turned on then next is 2022.1 s/p 2 with the MOD off

Any ideas? is there a known bug in this release BTW is a program that's been running for some time.​
  • I'd suggest removing the "." from all feature names. What are datum features D, A, and B? What is their relative orientation. What is your feature orientation?

    Do you have a geometric tolerance defined on datum feature A with respect to [D]? Do you have a geometric tolerance defined on datum feature B with respect to [D|A(M)]?
  • I used to get this a LOT in Xact Measure (even without datum boundary modifiers) when my datums were not square to each other, like -A- is a plane and -B- is a plane that is 70° off of -A- rather than 90°, or -C- is a compound angle hole for some reason. That reason usually being that engineers hate CMM programmers.

    I think I saw it once in GeoTol but I just remade the frame and it fixed, so I didn't look into it closer to try and find a why.

    Powerful tool, but programmatically (like PcDmis source code program, not a part program) a miserable b!tch to pull off clean in every single instance any engineer ever dreamed to torment us with.

    When I couldn't get it in Xact to stick, I'd align to the Feature Control Frame and use legacy.
  • Doublecheck your THEO's for datum A so they are correct. ID/OD etc.
  • in reply to JacobCheverie
    I just dimensioned the -A- to -D- and -B- to -D- , -A- (M) then re did it again and it came out good with no errors...
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement