hexagon logo

Tips Calibrated, wrist angles way off?

I have a program that uses T1A0B0, T1A90B0, T1A-90B0 and T1A90B180 and I tried to measure from the front of the part half a cylinder, then rotating to -90B180 and measuring the back half to construct a center axis, but the numbers were way off.

So then I went and re-calibrated and grabbed a gage block and made the attached program. I measured the front plane of the gage block and it related the A0B0 and A-90B0 correctly, but the plane on the back of the gage block using -90B180. It measures Y=76.802 instead of Y=76.200 so off by 0.6mm on the rear plane. Then I did the front plane with A90B180 and it was measuring at -0.3mm. I calibrated all tips and the probe results, are added. Did I forget to calibrate something or is something off with my wrist? Anyone have ideas as to what is going on or what I could have missed?

Attached Files
Parents
  • Calibrated A0B0 man+DCC then calibrated the rest with a didn't move command. I don't think I set a master, I'll look at how to define and calibrate a master, I don't remember how to do that, it's been a couple years since I programmed, still trying to "get back on the bike".


    For testing purposes, I would calibrate A0B0 answering yes the sphere has moved to either man or dcc and then calibrate the rest of the tip angles answering NO for each.
Reply
  • Calibrated A0B0 man+DCC then calibrated the rest with a didn't move command. I don't think I set a master, I'll look at how to define and calibrate a master, I don't remember how to do that, it's been a couple years since I programmed, still trying to "get back on the bike".


    For testing purposes, I would calibrate A0B0 answering yes the sphere has moved to either man or dcc and then calibrate the rest of the tip angles answering NO for each.
Children
No Data