hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • Replies 17 replies
  • Subscribers 32 subscribers
  • Views 267 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Nominals are changing once in a while when I rerun the program

timgramley
We recentely purchased a new version of PC-Dmis 2012 mr1. I've written a few part inspection programs and verified / ran them on different parts. I am seeing the nominals change every once in a while when I just run a program or more so when modify a program by adding a new dimension to the program. It doesn't seem to affect the new dimension, just random dimensions on the report which causes me to have change the nominal back and then refresh the report.

I experience this to a greater occurance when I run programs that I had created using 2010 MR1.

The 2012 MR1 program was installed on a brand new laptop.

I was told that 2010 MR1 had some memory leaks and that was the cause of the nominals changing. Does 2012 have the same issues too? ( we upgraded to get rid of the nuissance of having to shut down and restart every 10 -15 minutes of use on the old system )
Parents
  • I have noticed this in the past when only one alignment was used in the initial setup instead of a rough alignment and then a final using auto features. When i started programming arms the same way that i would a conventional i noticed i had less issues. Give it a shot and let me know if it helps.

    +1 on programming like a conventional. Even more so because of the inherent less-accurate nature of portable cmms. Manual technique cannot trump machine drive...

    I use multiple alignments to "iterate". Many times I will have variables assigned for some nominals, but recently learned that if I used them in the theo, I also had to use the same in the target... It fixed a similar issue for me.
Reply
  • I have noticed this in the past when only one alignment was used in the initial setup instead of a rough alignment and then a final using auto features. When i started programming arms the same way that i would a conventional i noticed i had less issues. Give it a shot and let me know if it helps.

    +1 on programming like a conventional. Even more so because of the inherent less-accurate nature of portable cmms. Manual technique cannot trump machine drive...

    I use multiple alignments to "iterate". Many times I will have variables assigned for some nominals, but recently learned that if I used them in the theo, I also had to use the same in the target... It fixed a similar issue for me.
Children
No Data
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement