Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
You may be 1 execute behind if the header is not re-evaluated. See my notes above to force re-evaluation.
I had the impression that problem only occurred for variables, but tracefields forced the re-evaluation. Have I just been lucky, or has something changed?
I have found out that it will automatically uppdate the header if the header file is correct. Like TRACEFIELD(1). but now I am trying to request the operator name and fill it in the revision field and it won't work. My code is
C3 = COMMENT/INPUT,NO,FULL SCREEN=YES
ENTER OPERATOR NAME
TRACEFILED/NO_DISPLAY,LIMIT=15; : C3.INPUT :
However when I do this it automatically grabs C2.INPUT which is the serial number. I am sure the header file is edited correctly. I even threw in "ASSIGN/V2=C3.INPUT". What could I be missing?
Well here's my code. I still can't see anything wrong with it.
C2 =COMMENT/INPUT,NO,FULL SCREEN=YES,
Enter serial Number:
ASSIGN/V1=C2.INPUT
TRACEFIELD/NO_DISPLAY,LIMIT=15 ; C2.INPUT :
$$ NO,
***********************************
end obtain serial number
***********************************
C32 =COMMENT/INPUT,NO,FULL SCREEN=YES,
Enter machinist name:
ASSIGN/V31=C32.INPUT
TRACEFIELD/NO_DISPLAY,LIMIT=15 ; C32.INPUT :
I copied the C2 section and made minor modifications so it would esentially be the same and it still doesn't work.
[COLOR=#333333]TRACEFIELD/NO_DISPLAY,LIMIT=15 ; OPERATOR : C32.INPUT [/COLOR][COLOR=#333333]TRACEFIELD/NO_DISPLAY,LIMIT=15 ; SERIALNUM : C2.INPUT[/COLOR]
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |