It's not ideal to co-simulate a mechanical system coupling in this way. Hopefully it will work, but there is a chance that the discretization of the coupling makes the system unstable. (But yes, FMU is the best way to do it for co-simulation; don't involve Simulink).
The other alternative is to create a template of your View model. The only downside I can see is that A/Machinery bearings are not supported in Car yet.
There are a few different ways to do it, but this is should work.
Save your View model as a cmd file.
Open A/Car template builder and create a new empty template. Save this. Edit the cmd file and remove the model create statement. Then search and replace all instances of the model name with the name of the template. Now you should be able to import this modified cmd into your template. Then go ahead and setup your communicators to work with the rest of your model.
I was able to solve the example in the link above.
In reviewing the results I see the full set of A/Car outputs but very limited results for the A/View model (and only when I import the results into the A/View model). I only see some A/View joint forces.
I tried different output settings in A/View and A/Car for this but didn't seem to help.
Is there a way to write out and view the full set of A/View results for the process in this example ... including graphic results of the A/View model?
OK, so you used the FMU approach. So you will get all the results from the Car model. And you have found the results file from the unpacked FMU for the View model. Correct?
Well, you have to define in the View model what outputs you want. Results, graphics and request files. Adams/View does not automatically create requests for all elements in the way Car does it, so you have to define all requests manually in the View model.
You will never be able to animate both models at the same time, at least not in Adams PPT (well you could load both models, bit results or graphics files and animate in separate views).
Was the simulation successful? No strange discretization problem? Stable results?
One thing I'm currently working on is stability of co-simulations and that includes FMU connections. So we are very interested in what you are doing. Anything you can tell us can help us create a better interface in Adams.
Thanks JSlat ....problem solved. I didn't realized the ADAMS/View result files are written to the folder <working_directory>\fmu\test\resources. That's what I was looking for as I was just seeing the A/Car result files.
The example model solved with no strange results..though this was just a rerun of the MSC example model.
Will likely use this FMU method so I can keep you posted on any suggestions.