I am trying to run a tire blow out simulation. I made some research and it seems the easiest way to use Ftire with inflation pressure around 0 bars.
I got an ftire data with pressures with the tire tests were performed at 8.5 and 10 bars.
I would like to get your opinions about making the analyses with the extrapolation form 8.5 to 10 bars to 0 bars inflation pressures would be realistic or not.
During my research I couldn't find any study with Adams in tire blow out analyses, have you seen any study on tire blow out analyses in Adams? Is there any easier way?
Simply scaling the Pacejka parameters during analysis is physically as realistic as Trump getting an Noble Price for communication skills.
Furthermore it involves a lot of additional elements and file hacking that is more complicated than changing a simple .tir-file and setting one environment variable.
I'd still recommend using FTire.
If you want it "easy", than get back to the GCON approach and simply uncouple the tire from the vehicle. If you want to "continue rolling on the rim", then you could use the new contact UDE's available in A/Car and set up a geometry contacting with the road after the original tire came loose. That'd be as (un)realistic as scaling the Pacejka parameters.
Simply scaling the Pacejka parameters during analysis is physically as realistic as Trump getting an Noble Price for communication skills.
Furthermore it involves a lot of additional elements and file hacking that is more complicated than changing a simple .tir-file and setting one environment variable.
I'd still recommend using FTire.
If you want it "easy", than get back to the GCON approach and simply uncouple the tire from the vehicle. If you want to "continue rolling on the rim", then you could use the new contact UDE's available in A/Car and set up a geometry contacting with the road after the original tire came loose. That'd be as (un)realistic as scaling the Pacejka parameters.