I am modeling a flex to rigid contact. In this I have two queries. First is regarding IMPACT function, it works decently well when surfaces remain in contact. But where there is frequent attach-detach scenario, I am getting random and impractical forces.
Second question is regarding contact force recorded in result file: I downloaded a macro from simcompanion which basically collates all the nodes and then calculated damping force and stiffness force seperately using inputs and basic IMPACT function. The total force given by this macro does not match with the force shown in result file. So what is the validity of the force shown in result file.
Download HertzWin and use that to get better estimate for the contact stiffness. Add increasing forces, read out the penetration and plot force vs displacement in Excel. Fit a power trendline and you have good guesses for stiffness and exponent.
Do not use damping values higher than 0.1% of stiffness value for metallic materials. Probably even lower than that. There is not much damping in steel-steel contact (here is a nice procedure: take a ball bearing ball and let it bounce on a steel plate, measure height, apply logarithmic decrement, correct for aerodynamic resistance)
Make sure that your solver settings are tight enough so that the solver is converged. For contact problems, HHT is usually good. Start with error=1e-5 and hmax=1e-3 and decrease until solutions converge.
Download HertzWin and use that to get better estimate for the contact stiffness. Add increasing forces, read out the penetration and plot force vs displacement in Excel. Fit a power trendline and you have good guesses for stiffness and exponent.
Do not use damping values higher than 0.1% of stiffness value for metallic materials. Probably even lower than that. There is not much damping in steel-steel contact (here is a nice procedure: take a ball bearing ball and let it bounce on a steel plate, measure height, apply logarithmic decrement, correct for aerodynamic resistance)
Make sure that your solver settings are tight enough so that the solver is converged. For contact problems, HHT is usually good. Start with error=1e-5 and hmax=1e-3 and decrease until solutions converge.