Hello, I am trying to simulate a birdstrike using Patran as my preprocessor. At the time of creating an ALE coupling between the surface and the bird. What are the parameters which have to be used (surface, 3d elements, etc) in order to fullfill the coupling? Can somebody please explain step by step what should be done?
Sorry for insisting so much in the case but I have done all the steps indicated in the previous posts. The surface is made of a laminate so I cannot use Dummy 2D elements because in interferes with the previous property.
I have used the same mesh for many other analysis and all have been succesful. The geometry is not modeled (I have just imported the mesh), can this be the issue?
From the pic it seems to me your coupling surface you defined is only that patch of elements? What I mean to say is that the coupling surface needs to be a completely closed surface (just like the bird mesh is a closed surface), even part of the structure that the bird or fluid will not interact with. So in your case the entire wing external surface needs to be selected.
I think I have the issue. Do both bird and structure have to be a solid? Because I am using surfaces imported from CATIA in .igs. I think that is the problem. Could you please confirm, please?
No - you can have surface structures, but the structure you want to interact with the fluid domain has to form a closed surface with no gaps. Think of the external skin of a wing. There could be a lot of internal structures like ribs and spars etc, but to define the coupling surface you only define the external portion such as the leading edge, top and bottom skins and training edge surfaces. If there are any gaps (like at the wing root) then you can use the Dummy 2D element property to mesh and close this area up. In the end you want a closed surface with no free edges when using the Element: Verify Boundaries tool.
(Once you get failure and you want to track the fluid moving into the structure, then that is a new chapter)
I think I finally have a model without any error. The objective of this analysis is to know the influence of the impact on the fuseage of my Lagrangian material.
Could you give me some tips is order to ask the correct Output Requests? I guess i would need to know the Effective Strain and Stress.
Our results are broken up into different element types.
So if you have shell elements (or defined beam sections with integration points) you request results for Sublayer variables. The default is for the 3 layers: inner, mid and outer. If you have a composite part you need to specify all layers manually, e.g. : 1,2,3,4,5,6
Usually for metallics outputting effective stress and strain (von mises) is good enough, but if you have failure model, then you also need to request the FAIL output to hide the failed elements in the output.
For composites we typically also want the full stress tensor values to check specific directions.
For solids we use the Lagrangian output and same rules as above apply (esp FAIL).
For fluids, the Eulerian Solids is the one and typically VEL, PRESS and what else is of interest (DENSITY, SIE etc). But very important to also have FMAT and/or FMATPLT for the fraction of material. Please see the following SimCompanion article for the difference: KB8022354 (had issue adding the link)
If you have more than one Euler material, you can append the specific material output with the material ID in the dat file, e.g. FMATPLT1 FMATPLT3 SIE1 SIE3 etc
The last ARC results that could be important if you want to show deformation in Paraview. Unlike Patran, Paraview does not automatically calculate the deformation from node displacements between outputs. For this you need to request an ARC output for GRIDS for all structural nodes.
The other outputs are also really important for quick debugging and model understanding. This is the THS outputs. You can look at these in Dytran Explorer during the analysis to see if all is well.
I typically always have:
Material summaries for all materials and all varaibles available.
Rigid body forces and displacements.
Coupling surface force results (overall force from fluid onto structure - perfect for birdstrike) .
Surface result (coupling surface totals of fluid associated with it: e.g. mass, momentum, energy - good to track total mass of bird that penetrates vs deflects if you have multiple coupling surfaces).
The main conclusion is the more the better! Once you get a feel you will see what else you want to add (Fluid markers, Euler boundary, contact results, beam fastener results etc).
I am having the following problems when I am asking for the results of the fluids and the contact surface.
It says that there is no contact and the outputs for the fluids are not legal. What could it be? I have repeated the steps again and I am getting the same result.
Could you post the error messages from the _ERROR_SUMMARY file?
Also in future can you start a new post for new topics as this will be difficult to find for other users who might get the same issue. I'll see if I can move the other questions above not related to ALE/Coupling setup into separate streams.