How does Marc uses these two kind of methods during calculation? Does these two kind of methods have a effect on final result?
In my opinion, these two methods only influence the convergence rate and if the calculation convergenced then the result should be similiar. I do a comparation test by changing this option in Marc, and the result shows big difference.
In the Full Newton-Raphson method, The tangent stiffness matrix is reformulated for each iteration (recycle).
In the Modified Newton-Raphson method, the tangent stiffness matrix is formulated only once per increment.
If contact or sudden material nonlinearities occur, reassembly cannot be avoided. The modified Newton-Raphson method is effective for large-scale, only mildly nonlinear problems. When the iterative solver is employed, simple back substitution is not possible, making this process ineffective. In such cases, the Newton-Raphson method should be used instead.
If you are expecting contact and material nonlinearities, then use the default N-R method.
In the Full Newton-Raphson method, The tangent stiffness matrix is reformulated for each iteration (recycle).
In the Modified Newton-Raphson method, the tangent stiffness matrix is formulated only once per increment.
If contact or sudden material nonlinearities occur, reassembly cannot be avoided. The modified Newton-Raphson method is effective for large-scale, only mildly nonlinear problems. When the iterative solver is employed, simple back substitution is not possible, making this process ineffective. In such cases, the Newton-Raphson method should be used instead.
If you are expecting contact and material nonlinearities, then use the default N-R method.