In the linear statics solution sequence (101), is there a way to get the results of each subcase to feed into the following subcase, similar to the way it automatically happens in the non-linear statics solution sequences (specifically 106)?

In the non-linear statics solution sequences (specifically 106), the results of each subcase feeds into the following subcase. Is there a way to replicate this in the linear statics solution sequence (101)? In 101, the subcases appear to be quite independent of each other. This particular problem is not making use of Super Elements. I am assuming this would require creating a DMAP alter to use the previous subcase results as "initial conditions" to the current subcase. I have a modest skill level in writing DMAP alters. Thanks.

Parents

0 Martin MSC Nastran over 6 years ago

Yes, by QA, have a known answer, maybe more than one, to verify the results are what you expect. Plausible but wrong answers seem to be easier to 'calculate' more than ever.

I have seen DMAP that takes preloading in one subcase and transfers the DIFFK and the displaced shape to another subcase. Part of this became the GRAVSET and RFORSET options via PARAMs in V2019. This might be a good start for added DMAP work.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 Martin MSC Nastran over 6 years ago

Yes, by QA, have a known answer, maybe more than one, to verify the results are what you expect. Plausible but wrong answers seem to be easier to 'calculate' more than ever.

I have seen DMAP that takes preloading in one subcase and transfers the DIFFK and the displaced shape to another subcase. Part of this became the GRAVSET and RFORSET options via PARAMs in V2019. This might be a good start for added DMAP work.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

No Data