hexagon logo

Sma

If your SMA is expired are you still entitled to MR that are released after your SMA expires? For example, I have version 4.2 and our SMA expired on 6/30/2008. Version 4.2 MR3 was released 2/10/2009. I'm I entitled to MR3?
Parents
  • Truly apologize, usually you are after me, so I thought you were this time too. I've been conditioned to think that way.

    I don't think we have opposing views of patches and SMA's, I want them too, and I want them regardless of SMA or not. But that's not how SMA's work at thousands of companies the world over, and I have direct experience with that. I wish everything was free too while we're at it, but it's not.


    Brian I addressed my remark to Kenny, or are you two one and the same, that would explain. . .

    I realize that everything I post, you are all over, but I can honestly say that not EVERY post I make is aimed at you. I am still posting here despite your presence, not because of it.

    You and I have opposing view points on the issue of SMA & whether or not a MR should be considered a "patch" of a full version that would not require current SMA. Kenny jumped in and took up for you on the grounds that you have helped people. I was pointing out in my usual sarcastic and obtuse manner that I have helped people too. Nowhere did I even so much as hint at the possible implication you might have said I did not help people. Did you need a trolly for that ego? Neutral face
Reply
  • Truly apologize, usually you are after me, so I thought you were this time too. I've been conditioned to think that way.

    I don't think we have opposing views of patches and SMA's, I want them too, and I want them regardless of SMA or not. But that's not how SMA's work at thousands of companies the world over, and I have direct experience with that. I wish everything was free too while we're at it, but it's not.


    Brian I addressed my remark to Kenny, or are you two one and the same, that would explain. . .

    I realize that everything I post, you are all over, but I can honestly say that not EVERY post I make is aimed at you. I am still posting here despite your presence, not because of it.

    You and I have opposing view points on the issue of SMA & whether or not a MR should be considered a "patch" of a full version that would not require current SMA. Kenny jumped in and took up for you on the grounds that you have helped people. I was pointing out in my usual sarcastic and obtuse manner that I have helped people too. Nowhere did I even so much as hint at the possible implication you might have said I did not help people. Did you need a trolly for that ego? Neutral face
Children
No Data