Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
Yes, that is correct. That is why you have to use the ideal gas law to find the difference in molar mass of the chamber air. Using this difference the only now is the volume of the evacuated air which you would then use atmospheric state variables to calculate along with the "missing" molar mass from the chamber. Divide this volume by time and you have your volumetric flow rate.
right, all I was saying is that it's impossible with provided info. The theo volume of air chamber does not reflect the actual and the leakage allowance is too small, you are talking about 5 cubic mm per second, that's not even a fart.
I do not see how it is impossible to calculate- I completely agree with jhingle. True, the theo and actual volumes are going to be slightly different, but the difference should be so small you can use the theo with very little error.
That would be a neat trick. We could assume and speculate all day long.
C'mon man, you can't be serious. It's called measurement uncertainty and you deal with it everyday. Not knowing the "exact" measurement of something is a fact of life. The fact that the allowance is so small is that much more of a reason to use calculations because there would be no real way to measure it.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |