Hello everyone. I would like to get some personal opinions from people who have used the Renishaw PH10M and the Hexagon HH-AS-T2.5 heads on their CMMs. We are in the process of purchasing a additional CMM. We currently have a CMM and are running a PH10M probe head on it along with a MicroVu with a Renishaw probe. I would like to hear from some of your thoughts on preference coming from hexagon these days?
T5 here and I wish it was PH10. It's a pain in the *** to edit programs to run on machine with PH10. Negative A angle is a disaster, the grids in add angle window is too small, got a headache every time I look at it, T2.5 is even smaller, maybe 2 pixels per square. Analog module is too long, you might need 2 probe racks to change over from analog to TTP. The slots on probe changer does not have covers to keep the dust off....got analog probe deflection error constantly, long pause between probe angle change, takes too long to register a hit.
T5 here and I wish it was PH10. It's a pain in the *** to edit programs to run on machine with PH10. Negative A angle is a disaster, the grids in add angle window is too small, got a headache every time I look at it, T2.5 is even smaller, maybe 2 pixels per square. Analog module is too long, you might need 2 probe racks to change over from analog to TTP. The slots on probe changer does not have covers to keep the dust off....got analog probe deflection error constantly, long pause between probe angle change, takes too long to register a hit.
