Do you have a preference where in your program you create you measured results. I find if I wait till the end of the program it takes longer because I have to go back and identify my features.
So once I've named my datums I'll create the results while the ID's are still fresh in my head.
(1) If you put all the dims at the end of the program, it actually takes longer to run the program, if the dims are with the feature, they calculate/generate as the machine is moving to the next feature.
(2) SOMETIMES, if you have to edit the program for whatever reason, and need to re-order the features, SOMETIMES the dimensions get blown away, but if the dim is with the feature, you move both at once, no problem.
I used to program this way until I started here..... All of the legacy programs here were run with measurements first then tolerance at the end and I believe it does take longer but I decided to follow the previous programmer's method for this as the only thing that matters from the shop people is clean and readable reports.
I used to program this way until I started here..... All of the legacy programs here were run with measurements first then tolerance at the end and I believe it does take longer but I decided to follow the previous programmer's method for this as the only thing that matters from the shop people is clean and readable reports.