Only sharing part of the print for nondisclosure purposes, but there was a lot wrong with it. Thought I would share this since it has been so annoying for me.
They put a position dimention on many of the faces when they clearly needed/wanted a surface profile.
They also had an M modifier on almost everything including: datums that are planes, flatness, and one distance dimension
Currently talking with my contact to see if we can get this straightened out.
Follow-up Post: I talked with the engineer and he thinks they do actually want the position dimension of the plain, even though I'm not convinced. I double-checked the print and it is to the ASME Y14.5-2009 standard. I don't think it gets any good data and I have been running the part and it says the planes are in the wrong spot along the plain getting numbers all over the place. Can someone give me a good resource as to what the true position of a plain is really measuring? Or what do tell the engineer bc I think you can only have this type of callout in some ISO standard.
These parts are also getting a coating so I have added that to the tolerance already. I know that could be affecting the results, but the results still say its WAY out.