hexagon logo

SPC Monitoring

How does your company monitor ongoing SPC? This includes monitoring Cp/Cpk/Pp/Ppk, control limits, dispersion, etc. This goes beyond the CMM. I am including measurements from micrometers, height gages, optical comparators, contracers, profilometer, etc.

We are a job shop that run different setups in presses, so variation from setup to setup on a particular part number is important to control. Currently, the operators entering the data monitor the information. Unfortunately, we have a culture that says, "As long as the Cpk is above 1.33, run the press." However, runs above and below mean and above and below control limits, trends, and range variation doesn't matter to production. This isn't good when the customer wants press floor data for SPC on critical characteristics and we have operators pencil whipping data and having massive ranges in their measurement methods that are impossible to see on certain features.

Our company is doing a refresher course on SPC at the end of the month for our production floor techs and operators, but I wanted to know how other companies collecting SPC data monitor and control the stats to assure that the most accurate data is being entered in their stats program.
Parents


  • We use PLEX. However, our floor operators are the ones that monitor it. It's really a culture thing that needs to change. Some of the operators care about SPC, but others just put measurements into the check sheet, not really paying attention to the data and enter a cookie cutter note in there when they are flagged.


    Are you using all the SPC functions? We would get alerts for everything: Cpk out, too many points above or below nominal, values within a certain zone of the upper or lower limits, etc. We had it set up to require a sign off to proceed. Our issue was that nobody, outside of quality, knew how bad things were. Instead of correcting the process, they just turned off all the SPC alerts. It also didn't help that we were a forging plant. Parts would purposely start out near the high limit on thicknesses and gradually work their way to the low limit as the die wore. This planned die wear would cause all kinds of SPC issues.
Reply


  • We use PLEX. However, our floor operators are the ones that monitor it. It's really a culture thing that needs to change. Some of the operators care about SPC, but others just put measurements into the check sheet, not really paying attention to the data and enter a cookie cutter note in there when they are flagged.


    Are you using all the SPC functions? We would get alerts for everything: Cpk out, too many points above or below nominal, values within a certain zone of the upper or lower limits, etc. We had it set up to require a sign off to proceed. Our issue was that nobody, outside of quality, knew how bad things were. Instead of correcting the process, they just turned off all the SPC alerts. It also didn't help that we were a forging plant. Parts would purposely start out near the high limit on thicknesses and gradually work their way to the low limit as the die wore. This planned die wear would cause all kinds of SPC issues.
Children
No Data