Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
This method I have had internal issues with. never anything i have documented or researched in any way but i believe (again just a mental simulation no proof) creating multiple alignments when creating your final alignment would incorporate deviation from the previously measured features. thus changing the location of the part with each alignment.
vs measuring the entire alignment features from one single alignment whether it be a manual alignment or the CMM startup alignment.
Just an opinion.
i would also like to state that in this example of plane circle circle i dont think it would have too much of an impact. however on a plane line point alignment or anything with more chance for deviation during measurement would have a greater impact on the alignment.
This method I have had internal issues with. never anything i have documented or researched in any way but i believe (again just a mental simulation no proof) creating multiple alignments when creating your final alignment would incorporate deviation from the previously measured features. thus changing the location of the part with each alignment.
vs measuring the entire alignment features from one single alignment whether it be a manual alignment or the CMM startup alignment.
Just an opinion.
i would also like to state that in this example of plane circle circle i dont think it would have too much of an impact. however on a plane line point alignment or anything with more chance for deviation during measurement would have a greater impact on the alignment.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |