Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
I dont see how you can possilby call out a cylinder center point as a 3D TP.
You could do the whole cylinder and that is sort of like 3D because the whole thing is evaluated. But a single point on the axis of a cylinder is not possible in the true sense. You might with the intersection of a plane, but why on earth would you do that, it has nothing to do with the location of the cylinder.
Someone is pulling your leg.
even if it is a center of the cylinder unless there is a sign S in front of the dia it's not to be treated as a sperical TP. there for it's olny evaluated in 2D
I agree.
You simply do not use the dimension that runs parallell with the cylinders centerline when doing the TP. Only speculations of what you are facing, but it would sure be much easier if a print/scan of the drawing was posted.
I dont see how you can possilby call out a cylinder center point as a 3D TP.
You could do the whole cylinder and that is sort of like 3D because the whole thing is evaluated. But a single point on the axis of a cylinder is not possible in the true sense. You might with the intersection of a plane, but why on earth would you do that, it has nothing to do with the location of the cylinder.
Someone is pulling your leg.
even if it is a center of the cylinder unless there is a sign S in front of the dia it's not to be treated as a sperical TP. there for it's olny evaluated in 2D
I agree.
You simply do not use the dimension that runs parallell with the cylinders centerline when doing the TP. Only speculations of what you are facing, but it would sure be much easier if a print/scan of the drawing was posted.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |