Ok, I have read the post regarding this so called argument that my boss and I got into today. He told me that you cannot measure true position in 3 axis, as I told him he was wrong. I know it depends on the way the FCF calls it out, but I tried to explain to him that it is possible to measure TP in 3 axis.
I have seen the formulas, so I know it's possible. I just wish I could get one of you gurus to reply back explaining that it is possible and why. I see the picture but he does not. I do not like to get into pissing matches with upper management, but I have learned a h**ll of alot from you guys, and I know this is possible. So if one of you fine gentleman can back me up on this, I would very much appreciate it. Thank you very much.
Now I am going to get a cold beer.
Gentleman, let's not get worked up over the situation. My original question was can you measure true postion in 3 axis? I spoke to one of the guys today about this drawing and he said it was wrongly dimensioned, ( as I thought it might be). The new FCF reads TP-.004 (DIA.)-To-A-B-C. No problem there. Level on -A- , take position to B and C, which are the only ones now!, in a basic dimension. The -A- dimension is not basic anymore. Simple alignment , measure the feature, and we're off ond rollin.
Sorry for all the confusion.
Gentleman, let's not get worked up over the situation. My original question was can you measure true postion in 3 axis? I spoke to one of the guys today about this drawing and he said it was wrongly dimensioned, ( as I thought it might be). The new FCF reads TP-.004 (DIA.)-To-A-B-C. No problem there. Level on -A- , take position to B and C, which are the only ones now!, in a basic dimension. The -A- dimension is not basic anymore. Simple alignment , measure the feature, and we're off ond rollin.
Sorry for all the confusion.