Slot Width/Length Bonus?

I've attached a print and code of my program on v3.5MR2.

First question is why is PC-Dmis adding both bonus tolerances, width & length, together to calculate the true position bonus? I'm looking at a old CMM report of v3.7MR3 and it is only using bonus tolerance of the width to calculate the true position bonus...Is this a known problem in v3.5MR2?

Second, I don't fully understand boundary and if it's possible to dimension correctly in v3.5MR2...

Thanks for your help.

Attached Files

Document1.pdf

Parents

Matthew D. Hoedeman over 15 years ago

I can't make the length RFS and the width MMC all in one feature. I ended up doing what you suggested and simply dimensioned the length out separately. It must be something they fixed after V3.5.

Matt, can you got into further detail on how you would go about measuring this as a boundary, what auto features you would use and such? Thanks

I would do a CLOSED SCAN with the scan generated from the cad data. Pretty much, that's what is required. None of the scan can violate the boundary boundaries, whichever why they chose to dimension it, either "bigger" or "smaller" or bi-lateral.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Cancel

Reply

Matthew D. Hoedeman over 15 years ago

I can't make the length RFS and the width MMC all in one feature. I ended up doing what you suggested and simply dimensioned the length out separately. It must be something they fixed after V3.5.

Matt, can you got into further detail on how you would go about measuring this as a boundary, what auto features you would use and such? Thanks

I would do a CLOSED SCAN with the scan generated from the cad data. Pretty much, that's what is required. None of the scan can violate the boundary boundaries, whichever why they chose to dimension it, either "bigger" or "smaller" or bi-lateral.
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Cancel

Children

No Data