Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
Is the Ø7.06 the same axis as Datum_A? If it is it's possible that there would be no deviation and therefore the measured would be zero. Probing it as a cylinder is giving you the bestfit of the cylinder which has at minimum 2 levels. The difference between the levels puts the position of the Ø7.06 feature in a different location than just using a simple auto circle and you would see different deviation. The drafter could have just missed it on the drawing but either way they are asking for the position of that feature. For me I would want to know the function of the feature to decide if I wanted to probe it as a circle or a cylinder. Either way works if it's in tolerance. I would think if the cylinder were important they would have asked for runout or cylindricity.
Is the Ø7.06 the same axis as Datum_A? If it is it's possible that there would be no deviation and therefore the measured would be zero. Probing it as a cylinder is giving you the bestfit of the cylinder which has at minimum 2 levels. The difference between the levels puts the position of the Ø7.06 feature in a different location than just using a simple auto circle and you would see different deviation. The drafter could have just missed it on the drawing but either way they are asking for the position of that feature. For me I would want to know the function of the feature to decide if I wanted to probe it as a circle or a cylinder. Either way works if it's in tolerance. I would think if the cylinder were important they would have asked for runout or cylindricity.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |