Your Products have been synced, click here to refresh
We have a ZEISS Prismo with CALYPSO, and we have two Sheffield Cordax CMM's with PCDMIS. My boss swears that Calypso is more accurate Than PCDMIS. Since our CMM's are not Comparably equipped, fixed head on ZEISS, PH10MQ on Sheffields, scanning on ZEISS, TTP's on Sheffields, Different Machines etc., I can't prove him wrong. I know there are some ZEISS machines out there that can run both software packages. Has anyone run any tests to prove the accuracy between the two software package? I beleive that with comparable CMM's equipped with comparable probing systems the differences between accuracies would be almost identical.
We have a ZEISS Prismo with CALYPSO, and we have two Sheffield Cordax CMM's with PCDMIS. My boss swears that Calypso is more accurate Than PCDMIS. Since our CMM's are not Comparably equipped, fixed head on ZEISS, PH10MQ on Sheffields, scanning on ZEISS, TTP's on Sheffields, Different Machines etc., I can't prove him wrong. I know there are some ZEISS machines out there that can run both software packages. Has anyone run any tests to prove the accuracy between the two software package? I beleive that with comparable CMM's equipped with comparable probing systems the differences between accuracies would be almost identical.
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. | Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement |