hexagon logo

Fun with GD&T! Datum Shift Revisited.

Ok, so it sounds like a simple question, do I get MMC/LMC bonus off a datum feature?
For example [Dia .005-M][A-M]
normal logic would state that I get bonus from my feature, and I get more bonus off my datum, that's how I have been taught to calculate it (with a calculator).
but in my little world I have the pleasure of programming in PC-Dmis and Calypso, and these programs don't always agree with each other (that's an understatement).
I've been up and down the internet, and this video is the best explanation I can find of why you don't get bonus from a datum.
I do believe the conundrum I am chasing is known as "Datum Shift / Datum Mobility".
You can search it on the internet, but reading that kind of text is difficult for me to digest, and what makes it even more difficult is that everyone refers to documents I do not have available.

But I still am left with the question of, Why does PCD give me bonus, and Calypso does not?

BTW I'm using PCD 2010 mr3, so I'm a little out of date. is this addressed in later versions?

https://www.tec-ease.com/gdt-tips-view.php?q=276
http://www.pcdmisforum.com/showthread.php?19372-Datum-Shift
http://www.pcdmisforum.com/showthread.php?21780-Pc-Dmis-Bonus-Tolerance-freak!!!-(MMC-Bonus-vs-Datum-Shift-discussion)

I would prefer simple answers like "Yes you get bonus, go ahead and add it all up" or "Stop taking that bonus, Only use the bonus from your feature".
Slight smile
Second question, what if the only modifier I have is on a datum?
Parents
  • +1



    I program with both PC-DMIS and Calypso and IMNSHO Calypso is much better when it comes to applying GD&T correctly than PC-DMIS is. I've been hosed by PC-DMIS's GD&T output before when using MMC/LMC from datums and still will find myself verifying the reported results. I will note that I do not use XactMeasure very often as our production CMMs are still running V3.7MR4.


    So.... you don't trust the numbers completely???



    Legacy does not handle material modifiers on datum properly in all cases. Supposedly Xactmeasure does. I am not any near mathmatically inclined enough to be able to say one way or the other.
Reply
  • +1



    I program with both PC-DMIS and Calypso and IMNSHO Calypso is much better when it comes to applying GD&T correctly than PC-DMIS is. I've been hosed by PC-DMIS's GD&T output before when using MMC/LMC from datums and still will find myself verifying the reported results. I will note that I do not use XactMeasure very often as our production CMMs are still running V3.7MR4.


    So.... you don't trust the numbers completely???



    Legacy does not handle material modifiers on datum properly in all cases. Supposedly Xactmeasure does. I am not any near mathmatically inclined enough to be able to say one way or the other.
Children
No Data