seems mainly inside of loops that they change on their own....
very frustrating when you don't see red but you may actually be out of tolerance because the nom changed its mind
3.7 MR2
bob
now your taking me to places I've never been...lol
I have only 4-5 months under my belt with PC-DMIS....I realize there is alot more for me to learn, but my gut feeling tells me that having to use math functions or other trickery, is not the right way. the nominals are "hard" numbers applied by "me" taken directly from the "print". the actuals or hits should "only affect" the "measured values", PERIOD
I was initially impressed by PC-DMIS,
I am still impressed by what it can do,
I am not thrilled by how intensive programming can be, never had to deal with vectors in Apogee,
I am becoming dissatisfied by what it does on its own...
I am still impressed by what it CAN DO.
and I am extremely impressed by the help on this forum
bob
now your taking me to places I've never been...lol
I have only 4-5 months under my belt with PC-DMIS....I realize there is alot more for me to learn, but my gut feeling tells me that having to use math functions or other trickery, is not the right way. the nominals are "hard" numbers applied by "me" taken directly from the "print". the actuals or hits should "only affect" the "measured values", PERIOD
I was initially impressed by PC-DMIS,
I am still impressed by what it can do,
I am not thrilled by how intensive programming can be, never had to deal with vectors in Apogee,
I am becoming dissatisfied by what it does on its own...
I am still impressed by what it CAN DO.
and I am extremely impressed by the help on this forum
bob
