We have 2 4.5.4 SFs. I ran a part 5 times on CMM A and then ran the exact same part on CMM B. Got different and same results.
CMM A runs 2016 and CMM B runs 2017. Both use the same star probe build. Both checked the same features with the same parameter... number hits, prehit retract, etc..
One CMM seems to read a little larger than the other. CMM B measures one feature 0.002" smaller than CMM A and CMM A measure a feature 0.0006" smaller than CMM B. One feature was exact on both CMMS, exact nominal and deviation, 0.000.
Essentially I copied the program from CMM A to CMM B and just adjusted some movespeeds.
Is this something normal? Operators at night sometimes will fail parts on one cmm and then take them to the other cmm and it pass so they pass the part through. I know they CMM will not match perfectly but they should be closer than 0.002". I'm trying to build confidence in the CMMs for the operators as its only be a few years of having CMMS.
Kp61dude! 61The older CMM measures more like our mics do. So the newer CMM running 2017 seems to be off a little.
DAN_M the touchspeeds on the both cmm were set to 2mm per sec and absolute speed was checked on both as well. The difference was that the top speed on the older one is set to 400 and the newer one is set to 250. Is that correct?
Kp61dude! 61The older CMM measures more like our mics do. So the newer CMM running 2017 seems to be off a little.
DAN_M the touchspeeds on the both cmm were set to 2mm per sec and absolute speed was checked on both as well. The difference was that the top speed on the older one is set to 400 and the newer one is set to 250. Is that correct?
Sounds good. Move speed is just how fast your moving from point to point. Touch speed is what needs to be the same on both machines before you can begin to troubleshoot accuracy concerns