hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • Replies 10 replies
  • Subscribers 221 subscribers
  • Views 87 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Opinions on S.F. 4.5.4 CMM

dwade
Need some input if anyone is using a S.F. 4.5.4 as management is looking to buy one.

If you do, what are your thoughts on the CMM? Are they accurate? Are the repeatable? Any mechanical issues with them? Any and all legitimate comments are welcome.

TIA
Duane
Parents
  • They can also be moved without the need for Hexagon or riggers. I've moved them a couple of times with no problems.

    Like I said in my other post, it depends on what you want to inspect on them. If you have lots of really small parts, its ok, if you have larger parts you might start hitting the working volume and you'll have a hard time with probe changes and stuff.

    Do your homework.
  • in reply to acgarcia
    management likes the idea of portability but my main concern is durability, accuracy and repeatability. Most of the parts that these machines will be checking are hip stems and femoral plates with the largest part being 1.5"W X 1.5"H X 7"L. The machine specs are borderline but should be OK for what needs to be measured.
Reply
  • in reply to acgarcia
    management likes the idea of portability but my main concern is durability, accuracy and repeatability. Most of the parts that these machines will be checking are hip stems and femoral plates with the largest part being 1.5"W X 1.5"H X 7"L. The machine specs are borderline but should be OK for what needs to be measured.
Children
No Data
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement