hexagon logo

2020 R2 True Position Datum Callouts

Good afternoon,

For a momentary fix I have resorted to using legacy mode to get this to work for now but I really don't want to use legacy mode for 1000+ feature reporting, I'm sure you can sympathize lol

I have been tasked with writing a program that has 3 shifts (part is 136" long and machine travel is 59.750"), and when programming the middle section I have to use a theoretical for Datum E and H (because they're unreachable). I did the typical thing and created a generic feature, with comments that the operator can input actuals for X and Y locations that turn into assignments within the dimensional data for the datums, based on results from the 1st program where they could be reached.

The issue I have is when trying to dimension a feature (circle feature, true position callout to D/H/E) it will not allow me to select the datums I assigned (Datum D is a reachable Plane, Datum H and E are both theoretical's from section 1 program data) and I have to adjust the alignment and use Legacy Mode to get results.

Is there a rule against Plane/Point/Point datum schemes in R2? I used to do this same thing in R1 all the time without fail. Does the math in R2 require something more than a point for a secondary datum? Do I need to create a 2nd point offset in X from the data of datum H to make a line, and then will be allowed to use the line as the secondary datum callout?

Attaching a copy of the print

Attached Files
Parents
  • Are you seeing an error message when you select DRF [D|H|E] in the geometric tolerance dialog window or the edit window?
  • equate alignment used to be SO MUCH better than it is now. It USED TO BE that you could measure any thing you wanted, anywhere you wanted, level, rotate, set origins, origin offsets, then equate that to a previous alignment that didn't measure ANY of those 'exact' features. for example, top of a fixture base, the edge, and a hole at the front (set up #1). Then shift it, measure a plane (all different hits, in new locations), measure the edge (again, different hits in new locations) then a hole at the back, and you could equate those 2 alignments. When they changed it to be more like LEAP FROG, that was a game-ender for me.
Reply
  • equate alignment used to be SO MUCH better than it is now. It USED TO BE that you could measure any thing you wanted, anywhere you wanted, level, rotate, set origins, origin offsets, then equate that to a previous alignment that didn't measure ANY of those 'exact' features. for example, top of a fixture base, the edge, and a hole at the front (set up #1). Then shift it, measure a plane (all different hits, in new locations), measure the edge (again, different hits in new locations) then a hole at the back, and you could equate those 2 alignments. When they changed it to be more like LEAP FROG, that was a game-ender for me.
Children
No Data