MetsoMetrology commented Today, 02:32 PM I'm with Buck on this one. Why would you tell a machinist to only adjust half the deviation in one direction? No need for calculations when making adjustments to nominal...
Flag
Can't count the times I have told the machinist to move in both directions the deviation, Just to tell him or her on the next piece to move it back Half of what I told him or her in the first place. again it's 2 Radii Not 2 parallel sides like a square, that I would understand. Anyway maybe your Machinist or Machines are magnificent. I have yet to come across any, "Even though it looks good on paper don't always mean it's good," So far My batting average, Probably about 98% spot on. One move and done. Don't know why, but it works
MetsoMetrology commented Today, 02:32 PM I'm with Buck on this one. Why would you tell a machinist to only adjust half the deviation in one direction? No need for calculations when making adjustments to nominal...
Flag
Can't count the times I have told the machinist to move in both directions the deviation, Just to tell him or her on the next piece to move it back Half of what I told him or her in the first place. again it's 2 Radii Not 2 parallel sides like a square, that I would understand. Anyway maybe your Machinist or Machines are magnificent. I have yet to come across any, "Even though it looks good on paper don't always mean it's good," So far My batting average, Probably about 98% spot on. One move and done. Don't know why, but it works
Oh and just to add, Let's say a hole is out .0012 in one direction. I'll tell them to move .0007 or .0008, boom within a .0001 Doesn't make sense but I leave error for tool wear or just any type of error. I think it has been more about trial and error.
