hexagon logo

Profile tolerance

Having a question with a program. My part has a profile callout of .040. The report shows +.020 -.020... And my results say .022, and is RED... I'm not seeing how a profile of .040 is out of tolerance when the result is .022?? Something just doesn't seem right....?
Parents
  • ASME14.5 profile is as follows:
    Condition 1: If all point are positive error the reported value is: Nominal "0" to your worst positive error. Example(profile of .04 AKA +.02-+.02) no negative error... worst positive error of 0.022 will result in a failing profile of .022
    Condition 2: If all point are negative error the reported value is: Nominal "0" to your worst negative error. Example(profile of .04 AKA +.02-+.02) no positive error... worst negative error of 0.022 will result in a failing profile of .022
    Condition 3: Error is both positive and negative: reports the difference between the largest negative and highest positive. Example(profile of .04 AKA +.02-+.02) 0.002 worst negative error... worst positive error of 0.019 will result in a passing profile of .021

    Only ISO GPS is 2x the worst error
  • Thats where it gets tough to explain to an engineer!
    But, in theory, if the surface checks negative .022... the profile WOULD be .044? (examples of your Condition 1 & 2)
    And positive .019, negative .002, would be a profile of .038 (example of your Condition 3) ??

    Even if the nominal was 1.000...and it checked 1.022, thats oversize with a profile of .044.?

    So I would have to show the engineer the actually CMM hits?
Reply
  • Thats where it gets tough to explain to an engineer!
    But, in theory, if the surface checks negative .022... the profile WOULD be .044? (examples of your Condition 1 & 2)
    And positive .019, negative .002, would be a profile of .038 (example of your Condition 3) ??

    Even if the nominal was 1.000...and it checked 1.022, thats oversize with a profile of .044.?

    So I would have to show the engineer the actually CMM hits?
Children
No Data