hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • Replies 9 replies
  • Subscribers 221 subscribers
  • Views 106 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

Constrained Least Squares confusion - 2021

lovethepirk
Currently on 2017 and use least squares for everything.

Regarding 2021+ My opinion is this new DEFAULT ..........'Constrained Least Squares' methodology, is not least squares, but is taking the highs and accounting for rocking conditions and they are calling it 'constrained least squares' when it is not least squares, it is the 'highs accounting for rocking'.

Am I missing something?



Parents
  • I was under the assumption from reading the manual that the new Default math type regarding 'Coinstrained Least Squares' is an external simulator then if needed does some least squares math to account for stability issues.

    ASME is all about functionality and external fits, avoiding interference. I don't see PCDMIS going to a math method that could push parts thru Quality that had interference fits. Am I reading this wrong somehow?
    Attached Files
Reply
  • I was under the assumption from reading the manual that the new Default math type regarding 'Coinstrained Least Squares' is an external simulator then if needed does some least squares math to account for stability issues.

    ASME is all about functionality and external fits, avoiding interference. I don't see PCDMIS going to a math method that could push parts thru Quality that had interference fits. Am I reading this wrong somehow?
    Attached Files
Children
No Data
© 2024 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement