hexagon logo

"Default" Math Vs "Legacy"?

What are we calling the new default Geo-Tol math? "New Math"? "Default Math"?
I remember this gun fight a loooong time ago, it ended up bad for Hexagon and us also.
what I mean is:
The "New Math" best fits a little too aggressive for me compared to "Legacy". Last time I had reports coming out with perfect true position our customer Lockheed Martin mopped the floor with Pc-Dmis and started the whole ISO Best-Fit shootout, disallowing us to use Pc-Dmis best fit algorithms. The "New Math" best fits also. Here is a comparison:



What do you think?
and can we come up with a disparaging term like "New Math" other than "Geo-Tol"? or "Geo out-of Tol"?

thx
Parents
  • Im old enough to remember a time around Aug of 2006 being in a hexagon training class and having the instructor tell us that "Xact measure is 100% to the standard and we should stop using legacy" we just "upgraded" from 3.5 MR2 to 4.0. I still use legacy to double check xact and geotol when addressing our machinist questions with the same caveat that Singularity mentioned.
Reply
  • Im old enough to remember a time around Aug of 2006 being in a hexagon training class and having the instructor tell us that "Xact measure is 100% to the standard and we should stop using legacy" we just "upgraded" from 3.5 MR2 to 4.0. I still use legacy to double check xact and geotol when addressing our machinist questions with the same caveat that Singularity mentioned.
Children