hexagon logo

Hexagon Wrist Failure After Less Than Four Years - Is This Normal?

A bit over three and a half years ago we bought our first continuous-scanning-capable CMM, a Global S Blue 9.12.8 with a HP-S-X1 scanning head (I believe that's just Hexagon's rebranding of the Leitz LSPX line) and Hexagon's 7.5 degree indexable auto wrist, the HH-AS8-T7.5. What the machine has allowed us to do has been amazing, and on the whole we're very happy with the system.

We've never crashed it badly (as in, nothing big enough to make any visible dents on either the scanning probe or the wrist), though I did put too much torque on the scanning head trying to set up a star probe at one point and had to replace that.

Over the course of the last week or so we've had repeated instances of the wrist not seating - sometimes it will try multiple times and then succeed, other times it will not succeed and then just give up. This morning I had to power cycle the entire system to get it to work after it gave up. From what I've seen this behavior points to a failure of the wrist that will require a replacement.

We use the machine frequently over two shifts, five days a week, but beyond the regular use I don't think we do anything that should be particularly hard on it. I see pictures in Hexagon's marketing literature of these heads waving around huge laser scanners that must weigh a good bit more than the scanning head we have on it. Is this seemingly-short lifespan normal? Did we just get a bad egg? Is there something in our use or programming that could be causing more than typical wear? My boss is not very happy at the thought of having to replace these so frequently. Any ideas would be appreciated.
Parents
  • I have had a PH9 fail after like 17 years, and I had a 7.5 degree hexagon head fail after 10 years - it WAS hit.
    I have a functioning 18 year old PH10, a five year old 7.5 degree hexagon head and a 11 year old Revo.

    I would say four years is abnormal.

    With what Matthew said above me, if you are running the thing 14 hours a day and it is rotating after every feature, maybe four years isn't abnormal, but I am more inclined to think someone might have crashed while no one was looking (we always blame the night shift lol), or changing probes manually and applying force that is causing it to unlock (again as stated) which probably led to the shorter than normal life span.

    I will say, I do my absolute best to program for efficient run cycles. I load a probe and do EVERYTHING I can with that probe before I change it. No probe checks the part with any rack time in between touches.
    I rotate an angle and do EVERYTHING I can with that angle.
    I don't look for an optimal angle, I look for an angle that will do as much as possible so I don't have to rotate the head.
    I don't want to move the machine clear to rotate the head, and I don't like sitting while it changes off the rack.
    This will also extend head life (at least on the heads that lock)
Reply
  • I have had a PH9 fail after like 17 years, and I had a 7.5 degree hexagon head fail after 10 years - it WAS hit.
    I have a functioning 18 year old PH10, a five year old 7.5 degree hexagon head and a 11 year old Revo.

    I would say four years is abnormal.

    With what Matthew said above me, if you are running the thing 14 hours a day and it is rotating after every feature, maybe four years isn't abnormal, but I am more inclined to think someone might have crashed while no one was looking (we always blame the night shift lol), or changing probes manually and applying force that is causing it to unlock (again as stated) which probably led to the shorter than normal life span.

    I will say, I do my absolute best to program for efficient run cycles. I load a probe and do EVERYTHING I can with that probe before I change it. No probe checks the part with any rack time in between touches.
    I rotate an angle and do EVERYTHING I can with that angle.
    I don't look for an optimal angle, I look for an angle that will do as much as possible so I don't have to rotate the head.
    I don't want to move the machine clear to rotate the head, and I don't like sitting while it changes off the rack.
    This will also extend head life (at least on the heads that lock)
Children
No Data