hexagon logo

2022.1SP6 Parallelism issue

I have 2 planes, PL1 is datum A (primary using minimax), and PL2 constructed from 7 basic scan/circle/plane. (least square, but it shouldn't change anything !)
Using geotol, it gives 7,1 µm
using legacy, it gives 35,1 µm
using assignments (ASSIGN/V1=DOT(PL2.HIT[1..PL2.NUMHITS].XYZ-PL1.XYZ,PL1.IJK) , then ASSIGN/V2=MAX(V1)-MIN(V1)), it gives 36,1 µm.
Then, constructing 7 planes from scans and construct a plane from their centroids, it gives about 8 µm (so I'm wondering if geotol uses them to calculate instead of hits ?)

Don Ruggieri , neil.challinor
Parents
  • So, started using [..] in my programs and it went flawlessly during creation. I had to revisit one of these programs today and PC-DMIS (2023.1 SP1) complained that the GeoTol evaluations for these features where I used the [..] trick didn't have any measured data:



    The report also showed evaluations in black with ERROR for all these evaluations.
    It started working as soon as I changed one of them to the standard syntax .HIT[1..FEATURENAME.NUMHITS] again.
    If I changed back to [..] the error message did not show up and all looked as expected. But, if I loaded the program up with the [..] syntax, it would display this error.

    neil.challinor - is this something you can verify? Is the [..] too new for usage perhaps?
  • I have tried in all different ways to make it repeat the behaviour in my post above, but I couldn't.

    If it happens again, I'll be sure to save at that particular point and provide you with the program neil.challinor
Reply Children
No Data