hexagon logo

csv output difference between 2017 and 2021

This isn't a pressing issue, but we have statistical software that was programmed to accept 2017 csv output. If anyone has seen the output it isn't pretty, very hard to read.

There was mention of updating to 2021 or greater soon and in our 2021 csv output, I was told it looks different enough where we would will have to re-map the outputs to the statistical software.

Was I told correctly that the output is different? I'm not impressed with how jumbled the csv output is, hard to read in my opinion.

Thanks.
Parents
  • Thanks for the reply...I don't actively program the CMM's but I am familiar with them. We are just using the default csv output. I've done some VBA scripting on the CMM, but refuse to do anymore until I learn how to integrate python into pcdmis, I just cannot stand vba.

    We have a satellite office using xml output, but that output makes zero sense, you cannot make sense of it. I guess since Geotol got implemented post 2017 the default csv output simply cannot be the same without some type of scripting.
Reply
  • Thanks for the reply...I don't actively program the CMM's but I am familiar with them. We are just using the default csv output. I've done some VBA scripting on the CMM, but refuse to do anymore until I learn how to integrate python into pcdmis, I just cannot stand vba.

    We have a satellite office using xml output, but that output makes zero sense, you cannot make sense of it. I guess since Geotol got implemented post 2017 the default csv output simply cannot be the same without some type of scripting.
Children
No Data