hexagon logo

csv output difference between 2017 and 2021

This isn't a pressing issue, but we have statistical software that was programmed to accept 2017 csv output. If anyone has seen the output it isn't pretty, very hard to read.

There was mention of updating to 2021 or greater soon and in our 2021 csv output, I was told it looks different enough where we would will have to re-map the outputs to the statistical software.

Was I told correctly that the output is different? I'm not impressed with how jumbled the csv output is, hard to read in my opinion.

Thanks.
Parents
  • If you have a pdf output, you can make sense of the data in the csv file. I've also found that headers can be input to the csv files so you can know exactly which output the values are from. But if you aren't utilizing PC-DMIS or reviewing pdf's then I can understand that the data in a csv file would read like gibberish to someone.
Reply
  • If you have a pdf output, you can make sense of the data in the csv file. I've also found that headers can be input to the csv files so you can know exactly which output the values are from. But if you aren't utilizing PC-DMIS or reviewing pdf's then I can understand that the data in a csv file would read like gibberish to someone.
Children
No Data