hexagon logo

Reporting Profile

I've been reporting Profile by creating a feature set and using the Max/Min output, but currently had a report rejected by a customer because of that. they don't want the max/min.

another thing they want me to show for the Profile is each individual point I take, including the nominal location of each point and its actual location.

I hope I explained myself well enough for you guys to understand that.

So I ask , How do you guys report PROFILE?
Parents
  • there's no other way TO use profile.

    the MEAS value is the difference between MAX and MIN. Leaving those out of the report is misleading, if not downright disastrous.


    Example:

    I'm scanning the surface of my mouse, attempting to see if it's within .010 to it's CAD model (we'll assume you have FINDNOM turned on, scan created correctly, and Profile Dim is +/- 0.010). MAX / MIN are not added to this report.

    the first mouse I scan shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.005; OTOL = 0.000). Sweet, looks like the mouse surface falls within profile.
    the second mouse shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.005; OTOL = 0.004). Wait, aren't I inside the tolerance band?
    the third mouse shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.015; OTOL = 0.012).
    the fourth mouse shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.012; OTOL = 0.000). What is happening here?

    MEAS is the difference between MIN MAX. Had we included it, we'd have seen the following:

    first mouse had a MIN of -.005, MAX of 0.000; well within the tolerance band
    second mouse had a MIN of .009, MAX of 0.014; too much material
    third mouse had a MIN of 0.007, MAX of 0.022
    fourth mouse had a MIN of -0.008, MAX of 0.004; within the tolerance bad.

    Adding MIN/MAX is essential to understanding what your part is doing, you can't really leave it off your report for those reasons. In fact, when showing profile I only use ( MAXMIN, TOL, DEV, OUTTOL) for those reasons. MEAS just confuses people when it comes to profile.




Reply
  • there's no other way TO use profile.

    the MEAS value is the difference between MAX and MIN. Leaving those out of the report is misleading, if not downright disastrous.


    Example:

    I'm scanning the surface of my mouse, attempting to see if it's within .010 to it's CAD model (we'll assume you have FINDNOM turned on, scan created correctly, and Profile Dim is +/- 0.010). MAX / MIN are not added to this report.

    the first mouse I scan shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.005; OTOL = 0.000). Sweet, looks like the mouse surface falls within profile.
    the second mouse shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.005; OTOL = 0.004). Wait, aren't I inside the tolerance band?
    the third mouse shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.015; OTOL = 0.012).
    the fourth mouse shows (NOM = 0; TOL = +/- 0.010; MEAS = 0.012; OTOL = 0.000). What is happening here?

    MEAS is the difference between MIN MAX. Had we included it, we'd have seen the following:

    first mouse had a MIN of -.005, MAX of 0.000; well within the tolerance band
    second mouse had a MIN of .009, MAX of 0.014; too much material
    third mouse had a MIN of 0.007, MAX of 0.022
    fourth mouse had a MIN of -0.008, MAX of 0.004; within the tolerance bad.

    Adding MIN/MAX is essential to understanding what your part is doing, you can't really leave it off your report for those reasons. In fact, when showing profile I only use ( MAXMIN, TOL, DEV, OUTTOL) for those reasons. MEAS just confuses people when it comes to profile.




Children