hexagon logo
Register Sign in
  • State Not Answered
  • Replies 8 replies
  • Subscribers 7 subscribers
  • Views 129 views
  • Users 0 members are here
Options
Related

SPMM testrig and chassis templates with a Flex-body are generating an error.

burford.john
I've replaced the ges_chassis body with a flex-body and run the assembly on the SPMM testrig. This generates an error.
 
Reading in property files...
Reading of property files completed.
Setting up vehicle assembly for SPMM...
ERROR:  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
ERROR:  Error detected on line number 316, character 139 of the macro '.ACAR.macros.mac_ana_ful_spm_sub'.
ERROR:   "adams_id" is neither a field in nor a child of ""
ERROR:     (eval("control/routine=acarSDM::con952,function=user(952,"//.F98_spmm_01.testrig.cis_body_subsystem[2].cm.<<adams_id>>//",3,4,5)"))
ERROR:  The command was not executed.
ERROR:  +2&>           (eval("control/routine=acarSDM::con952,function=user(952,"//.F98_spmm_01.testrig.cis_body_subsystem[2].cm.adams_id//",3,4,5)")), &
ERROR:  ---------------------------------------------------------------------
 
This error appears to be common to all chassis templates in acar_shared and acar_concept databases when run on the SPMM testrig with the ges_chassis part replaced with a Flex-body except for _flex_chassis.tpl.
 
Has anyone generated a procedure or script to apply the entities in _flex_chassis.tpl to a standard chassis template like _rigid_chassis_bof.tpl ?
 
Any suggests would be appreciated.
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
 
Parents
  • 0
    I got a chassis template that runs properly with a rigid chassis (see F98_spmm_rigid_chassis_01_spmm.msg). One hickup is the aero geforce has to be manually deactivated. That's a secondary issue as to why the aero gforce is not being deactivated by the submission macro:mac_ana_ful_spm_sub.
     
    The trouble is when I import an MNF for the ges_chassis body, and submit an SPMM analysis
     
    The trouble happens after the static equilibrium solution completes and the Quasi-Static starts and fails to converge.
     
    I've tested replacing the ges_chassis with the flexbody on the SDI testrig without a problem. Straight line, cornering, and full course simulations run fine.
     
    The issue is probably some joint or entity being activated/deactivated between the SVC suspension setup analysis and the Quasi static analysis. What ever is happening there is the problem.
     
    Any ideas would be appreciated.
    Attached Files (1)
Reply
  • 0
    I got a chassis template that runs properly with a rigid chassis (see F98_spmm_rigid_chassis_01_spmm.msg). One hickup is the aero geforce has to be manually deactivated. That's a secondary issue as to why the aero gforce is not being deactivated by the submission macro:mac_ana_ful_spm_sub.
     
    The trouble is when I import an MNF for the ges_chassis body, and submit an SPMM analysis
     
    The trouble happens after the static equilibrium solution completes and the Quasi-Static starts and fails to converge.
     
    I've tested replacing the ges_chassis with the flexbody on the SDI testrig without a problem. Straight line, cornering, and full course simulations run fine.
     
    The issue is probably some joint or entity being activated/deactivated between the SVC suspension setup analysis and the Quasi static analysis. What ever is happening there is the problem.
     
    Any ideas would be appreciated.
    Attached Files (1)
Children
No Data
© 2025 Hexagon AB and/or its subsidiaries. Privacy Policy | Cloud Services Agreement