This error appears to be common to all chassis templates in acar_shared and acar_concept databases when run on the SPMM testrig with the ges_chassis part replaced with a Flex-body except for _flex_chassis.tpl.
Has anyone generated a procedure or script to apply the entities in _flex_chassis.tpl to a standard chassis template like _rigid_chassis_bof.tpl ?
Both of these templates are working with SPMM testrig
There is just one difference
Communicator Matching Name: flexible_body
Input Communicator Name: cis_flexible_body
Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG
Output Communicator Name: cos_body
Output from: _flex_chassis
So i modified rigid_chassis_lt, replaced rigid chassis with flexible one (i used mnf from concept database), move flex part to location -1275.0, 0.0, -220.0
what is needed after modification, you have to modify cos_body communicator and add there matching name: flexible_body
in attachment you have my template from Adams 2018 based on rigid_chassis_lt
Also i have noticed few strange this (maybe bug), maybe just my lack of knowledge. For flexible body in template builder i was using right click in tree on rigid part/ make flexible, then import mnf.
What i do not understand: flexible part is still ges not fbs as it should be:
Also if i right click on this part and use modify. Then Adams uses this window:
not this one as usually:
If i use build/parts/flexible body/modify
then after selecting flexible body which i want to modify, there is warning about:
I got a chassis template that runs properly with a rigid chassis (see F98_spmm_rigid_chassis_01_spmm.msg). One hickup is the aero geforce has to be manually deactivated. That's a secondary issue as to why the aero gforce is not being deactivated by the submission macro:mac_ana_ful_spm_sub.
The trouble is when I import an MNF for the ges_chassis body, and submit an SPMM analysis
The trouble happens after the static equilibrium solution completes and the Quasi-Static starts and fails to converge.
I've tested replacing the ges_chassis with the flexbody on the SDI testrig without a problem. Straight line, cornering, and full course simulations run fine.
The issue is probably some joint or entity being activated/deactivated between the SVC suspension setup analysis and the Quasi static analysis. What ever is happening there is the problem.
I've been switching the rigid-body to a flex-body by "modify general part" dialog box. There is a bottom for "Rigid to Flex". That brings up the "Swap a rigid for a Flexbody" dialog box. The "ges_chassis" body gets renamed to "ges_chassis_flex". A warning does come up that comminicator information is not saved in the subsystem. Afterwards the import "modify general part" dialog box looks the same except the "flexbody body modify" icon is now available. I've not had a problem opening and closing the "flexbody body modify" dialog box.
i will check aero forces, what i was trying to say that after replacing rigid to flexible in rigid_chassis template the vehicle was able to run maneveurs, only spmm was not possible. after modification of communicator, spmm was also ok. My modification where pure in template level.
Do you have knowledge why spmm needs one more communicator in case of flexible chassis and rigid chassis not?
The submission macro searches for "flexible_body" to change a hidden parameter value from 0 to 1. That turns on and off a group of entities that changes how the SPMM testrig connects to the ges_chassis body. There must be some other thing happening as well that is causing my problem. I was able to get the model to partically run quasi-statics by turning the solver stablity factor up to "1" usually this is 1E-4. What I could see is the steering system moving as if the motion to lock the steering was not connected.