SPMM testrig and chassis templates with a Flex-body are generating an error.

burford.john over 5 years ago

I've replaced the ges_chassis body with a flex-body and run the assembly on the SPMM testrig. This generates an error.

Reading in property files...

Reading of property files completed.

Setting up vehicle assembly for SPMM...

ERROR: ---------------------------------------------------------------------

ERROR: Error detected on line number 316, character 139 of the macro '.ACAR.macros.mac_ana_ful_spm_sub'.

ERROR: "adams_id" is neither a field in nor a child of ""

ERROR: (eval("control/routine=acarSDM::con952,function=user(952,"//.F98_spmm_01.testrig.cis_body_subsystem[2].cm.<<adams_id>>//",3,4,5)"))

ERROR: The command was not executed.

ERROR: +2&> (eval("control/routine=acarSDM::con952,function=user(952,"//.F98_spmm_01.testrig.cis_body_subsystem[2].cm.adams_id//",3,4,5)")), &

ERROR: ---------------------------------------------------------------------

This error appears to be common to all chassis templates in acar_shared and acar_concept databases when run on the SPMM testrig with the ges_chassis part replaced with a Flex-body except for _flex_chassis.tpl.

Has anyone generated a procedure or script to apply the entities in _flex_chassis.tpl to a standard chassis template like _rigid_chassis_bof.tpl ?

Any suggests would be appreciated.

Parents

0 jozef.bucha over 5 years ago

Hello John,

If you make communicator test between

.__MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG                                                             any

._flex_chassis                                                                                      any

you will get

!--------------------------- Matched communicators: ---------------------------!

Communicator Matching Name: body_subsystem

Input Communicator Name: cis_body_subsystem

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body_stake

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_front_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_rear_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: chassis_path_reference

Input Communicator Name: cis_chassis_reference

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_chassis_path_reference

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: flexible_body

Input Communicator Name: cis_flexible_body

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body

Output from: _flex_chassis

between

.__MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG                                                             any

._rigid_chassis_lt                                                                                any

Communicator Matching Name: body_subsystem

Input Communicator Name: cis_body_subsystem

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body_subsystem

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_front_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_rear_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Communicator Matching Name: chassis_path_reference

Input Communicator Name: cis_chassis_reference

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_chassis_path_reference

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Both of these templates are working with SPMM testrig

There is just one difference

Communicator Matching Name: flexible_body

Input Communicator Name: cis_flexible_body

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body

Output from: _flex_chassis

So i modified rigid_chassis_lt, replaced rigid chassis with flexible one (i used mnf from concept database), move flex part to location -1275.0, 0.0, -220.0

what is needed after modification, you have to modify cos_body communicator and add there matching name: flexible_body

in attachment you have my template from Adams 2018 based on rigid_chassis_lt

Jozef

Attached Files (1)

_rigid_chassis_lt_mod.tpl.zip
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Reply

0 jozef.bucha over 5 years ago

Hello John,

If you make communicator test between

.__MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG                                                             any

._flex_chassis                                                                                      any

you will get

!--------------------------- Matched communicators: ---------------------------!

Communicator Matching Name: body_subsystem

Input Communicator Name: cis_body_subsystem

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body_stake

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_front_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_rear_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: chassis_path_reference

Input Communicator Name: cis_chassis_reference

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_chassis_path_reference

Output from: _flex_chassis

Communicator Matching Name: flexible_body

Input Communicator Name: cis_flexible_body

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body

Output from: _flex_chassis

between

.__MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG                                                             any

._rigid_chassis_lt                                                                                any

Communicator Matching Name: body_subsystem

Input Communicator Name: cis_body_subsystem

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body_subsystem

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_front_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_front_loc

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Communicator Matching Name: bedplate_rear_loc

Input Communicator Name: ci[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: co[lr]_bedplate_rear_loc

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Communicator Matching Name: chassis_path_reference

Input Communicator Name: cis_chassis_reference

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_chassis_path_reference

Output from: _rigid_chassis_lt

Both of these templates are working with SPMM testrig

There is just one difference

Communicator Matching Name: flexible_body

Input Communicator Name: cis_flexible_body

Located in: __MDI_SPMM_TESTRIG

Output Communicator Name: cos_body

Output from: _flex_chassis

So i modified rigid_chassis_lt, replaced rigid chassis with flexible one (i used mnf from concept database), move flex part to location -1275.0, 0.0, -220.0

what is needed after modification, you have to modify cos_body communicator and add there matching name: flexible_body

in attachment you have my template from Adams 2018 based on rigid_chassis_lt

Jozef

Attached Files (1)

_rigid_chassis_lt_mod.tpl.zip
Cancel
Vote Up 0 Vote Down

Sign in to reply

Verify Answer

Cancel

Children

No Data