hexagon logo

"request activity" for damper and bumstop doesent match?

Hello ,
funtion "request activity" can get request wrt-I and wrt-J. But for damper and bumpstop, the I marker and J marker are the same, which doesnt match what we want. Ohterweise, for bushing, spring, rebound are logical in the mind. So , is my thouht wrong?
image
Parents
  • Hi Alex and Henrik
    Thanks for you feedback.
    In order to explain more clear from me, i attach the comprasion between bushing and bumpstop.
    Please look at the difference about marker order for wrt_I and wrt_J both entries in the picture.
    For example, if people was interested in request from I part. Then the I_marker should be imarker, J_marker shuold be jmarker, rmarker should be located in I part.
    If people was interested in reqeust from Jpart. Then the I_marker should be jmarker, J_marker should be imarker, the rmarker should be located in J part.
     
    ​It was what we want for bushing/spring/rebound entities. But it was not what we want for damper/bumpstop entities in version 2021.04. And it should be.
     
    Is there anything wrong from my thought?
     
    image
Reply
  • Hi Alex and Henrik
    Thanks for you feedback.
    In order to explain more clear from me, i attach the comprasion between bushing and bumpstop.
    Please look at the difference about marker order for wrt_I and wrt_J both entries in the picture.
    For example, if people was interested in request from I part. Then the I_marker should be imarker, J_marker shuold be jmarker, rmarker should be located in I part.
    If people was interested in reqeust from Jpart. Then the I_marker should be jmarker, J_marker should be imarker, the rmarker should be located in J part.
     
    ​It was what we want for bushing/spring/rebound entities. But it was not what we want for damper/bumpstop entities in version 2021.04. And it should be.
     
    Is there anything wrong from my thought?
     
    image
Children
No Data